- Estate Planning
- How To
Can You Disinherit Your Child in Australia? (2026 Guide)
Can you disinherit your child in Australia? You can leave a child out of your Will — but you can't stop them making a family provision claim. Learn how the risk changes for adult vs dependent children, the rules by state, and the legitimate steps that reduce a challenge.
Short answer
Yes — you can leave a child out of your Will in Australia. You have testamentary freedom to decide who benefits. What you can’t do is stop that child from making a family provision claim — and biological and adopted children can claim in every state and territory. A court can override your Will and award them a share if it decides you didn’t make adequate provision for them. So the real question isn’t “can I?” — it’s “how do I do it so the decision holds up?”
This guide covers whether you can disinherit a child, why leaving them out doesn’t end the story, how the risk changes for adult versus dependent children, the rules and deadlines in each state, and the legitimate steps that make your decision far harder to overturn. If you want the general mechanics of leaving anyone out — including how to do it in Will Hero — see how to exclude someone from your Will; this article is specifically about children, who are treated differently from everyone else.
Disinherit vs. leave out: what actually happens
There’s a gap between what people mean by “disinherit” and what the law allows:
- Leaving a child out of your Will — completely within your rights. You can give them nothing, or less than their siblings.
- Preventing a child from claiming — not something any Will can do. Australian law lets certain family members ask a court for provision regardless of what your Will says.
So you can exclude a child. You cannot immunise your estate against their claim. The goal is to make a deliberate, well-documented decision that a court is far more likely to respect.
The rule that overrides your Will: family provision
Every Australian state and territory has family provision legislation (in Tasmania it’s still called testator’s family maintenance). It lets an eligible person apply to the court for a share — or a larger share — of an estate if the Will didn’t make adequate provision for their proper maintenance, education or advancement in life.
Children — biological and adopted — are eligible claimants in every jurisdiction. That makes a child the single most important person to think carefully about when you’re leaving someone out. When a claim is made, the court weighs things like:
- the child’s financial position, needs and resources;
- the size and nature of the estate;
- the relationship between you and the child, including any estrangement — and who caused it;
- competing claims from other beneficiaries and eligible people;
- any provision or support you already gave the child during your life; and
- any disability, age or special need.
An explicit exclusion clause is important — but on its own it does not stop a claim. Courts focus on adequacy of provision, not on the emotional reasons for exclusion.
Adult children vs dependent children: the risk is very different
Not all children carry the same risk when left out.
| Situation | Risk if left out |
|---|---|
| Minor child, or a child financially dependent on you | Very high. Courts strongly protect dependent children — this is where they’re most likely to intervene. |
| Adult child with a disability or genuine financial need | High. Need plus a moral obligation tends to succeed. |
| Financially independent adult child, long estrangement they caused | Lower (but never zero) — especially from a modest estate. |
| Adult child in Victoria | Victoria is tougher on adult children: the court must weigh how far they can support themselves, which limits claims by those not in genuine financial need. |
The practical takeaway: disinheriting a dependent or struggling child is legally fragile, while excluding a financially secure, long-estranged adult child from a modest estate is much more defensible — provided you document it properly (below).
The rules and deadlines by state
The core principle is national, but eligibility details and — critically — the deadline to claim differ. The deadline also differs in what starts the clock: some states count from the date of death, others from the grant of probate.
| State / Territory | Governing law | Time limit to claim |
|---|---|---|
| NSW | Succession Act 2006 (NSW) | 12 months from date of death |
| VIC | Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) | 6 months from the grant |
| QLD | Succession Act 1981 (Qld) | Notice within 6 months; claim within 9 months from death |
| WA | Family Provision Act 1972 (WA) | 6 months from the grant |
| SA | Succession Act 2023 (SA) | 6 months from the grant |
| TAS | Testator’s Family Maintenance Act 1912 (Tas) | 3 months from the grant (shortest in Australia) |
| ACT | Family Provision Act 1969 (ACT) | 6 months from the grant |
| NT | Family Provision Act 1970 (NT) | 12 months from the grant |
A couple of points worth knowing: South Australia’s rules changed on 1 January 2025 (the Succession Act 2023 (SA) replaced the old 1972 Act and reshaped eligibility — broadening when stepchildren can claim while restricting former spouses, grandchildren, siblings and parents; a natural child remains eligible), and courts can grant leave for a late claim in limited circumstances — usually only if the estate hasn’t been fully distributed. Tasmania has the narrowest list of eligible claimants — essentially spouses, children (including adopted children), and parents only where there’s no spouse or child; grandchildren, siblings and other dependants are shut out. A natural or adopted child, though, is always an eligible claimant there. Stepchildren and grandchildren are treated differently again from state to state, which is a separate topic from a natural child.
Can you get around it with super, trusts or joint assets?
This is the most common “workaround” — and the most misunderstood. Some assets can pass outside your estate, and because family provision claims are usually made against the estate, moving assets out can, in theory, reduce what’s available to a claimant:
- Superannuation paid via a valid binding death benefit nomination;
- assets held in a discretionary (family) trust; and
- property owned as joint tenants (which passes automatically to the survivor).
But there’s a serious catch, and it’s called notional estate. New South Wales law lets a court claw certain assets — including superannuation and some transfers made before death — back into the estate to satisfy a family provision order. In Benz v Armstrong [2022] NSWSC 534, a multi-million-dollar self-managed super death benefit — paid under a valid binding death benefit nomination to the deceased’s second wife — was reached through the notional estate rules. Three of his six children, left almost nothing under the Will, received provision orders totalling about $3.7 million (plus costs).
So the honest position is: “just put it in super or a trust and they can’t touch it” is not reliable — especially in NSW. Legitimate structuring done early, for genuine reasons, can have a place, but treat any promise of a bulletproof workaround with suspicion, and get tailored advice before restructuring anything.
How to reduce the risk of a successful claim
You can’t guarantee a child won’t claim. You can make the decision far more likely to hold up:
- Use a clear, deliberate exclusion clause. Don’t just silently omit the child — silence lets a court wonder whether you simply forgot them. Name them and state that the omission is intentional. Will Hero inserts a structured exclusion clause for you (see how to exclude someone from your Will).
- Write a statement of reasons — ideally a statutory declaration. Explain why: the relationship history and any estrangement (and who caused it), any attempts to reconcile, the financial support you already gave (with figures), and your understanding of the child’s financial position. It won’t bind the court, but it’s strong evidence of your intentions. A sworn, witnessed statutory declaration carries more weight than a loose note.
- Consider a modest gift instead of nothing where the risk is real. A deliberate smaller share, or a gift on conditions, can be harder to disturb than a complete exclusion — and can make a claim less attractive to run. Remember too that the legal costs of a family provision fight are often paid out of the estate, so even a claim that only partly succeeds can eat into what your intended beneficiaries actually receive — another reason a modest, deliberate gift can be cheaper than a fight.
- Keep your evidence. Dates, messages, notes of key events — anything that supports your account of the relationship.
- Get legal advice where the stakes are high — a large estate, a dependent or disabled child, or a challenge that looks likely. This is one of the higher-risk estate decisions, and documentation is where cases are won or lost.
A note for South Australia: since 1 January 2025, section 116(2)(a) of the Succession Act 2023 (SA) makes the wishes of the deceased the court’s primary consideration in a family provision claim — with the court also required to weigh your documented reasons and the applicant’s vulnerability, contribution and conduct. It doesn’t give you a veto (the court can still order provision for proper maintenance), but it puts real weight behind a clearly drafted Will and a well-prepared statement of reasons — which makes the two steps above matter even more in SA.
A well-made Will is the foundation of all of this. It sets out your wishes clearly and in enforceable terms, records your exclusion deliberately, and pairs with a statement of reasons to show the court exactly what you intended — and why.
Will Hero lets you build a legally valid Will online, add a structured exclusion using our provisions library, and update it whenever your circumstances change. Succession law varies by state, so your Will is tailored to yours.

The bottom line
You can disinherit a child in Australia — but you can’t stop them from asking a court for provision, and a court can override your Will if it decides you didn’t provide adequately. Whether a claim succeeds depends on the child’s need, your relationship, the size of the estate, and your state’s rules. The way to make your decision stick is to be deliberate and well-documented: a clear exclusion clause, a statement of reasons, sensible structuring, and advice where the stakes are high.
For the flip side — what happens if there’s no Will at all — see what happens if you pass away without a Will in Australia. For blended families juggling a new partner and children from an earlier relationship, see blended family Wills in Australia.
Make your wishes unmistakable
- How to Exclude Someone From Your Will — the step-by-step for adding an exclusion clause in Will Hero
- How to Make a Legally Valid Will in Australia — get the foundations right
- Blended Family Wills in Australia — protecting a partner and children together
- Does a Spouse Automatically Inherit Everything in Australia? — how spouses fit the picture
Ready to start? Create your Will online with Will Hero — add a clear exclusion clause, tailor it to your state, and update it any time. A Will is $99, or $158 for a couple. See how it works and pricing.
Frequently Asked Questions
You can leave a child out of your Will — Australia recognises testamentary freedom, so you decide who benefits. What you cannot do is stop that child from bringing a family provision claim. Biological and adopted children are eligible to claim in every state and territory, and a court can override your Will and award them a share if it decides you did not make adequate provision for their proper maintenance, education or advancement in life.
Yes. An adult child is an eligible claimant in every Australian state and territory, though success is not automatic — the court weighs their financial need and resources, the size of the estate, the nature of the relationship (including any estrangement and who caused it), competing claims, and any support you already gave them. Victoria is tougher on adult children — the court must weigh how far they can reasonably support themselves, which limits claims by those not in genuine financial need. A financially independent adult child from a modest estate has a weaker claim than a dependent or struggling one.
No. Estrangement on its own does not defeat a family provision claim. The court looks at the whole relationship — how the estrangement arose, who caused and maintained it, whether there were attempts at reconciliation, and the child's conduct towards you — alongside their financial need. An estrangement your child caused and sustained weighs against them; one you initiated weighs less. Document the history: it becomes evidence.
Sometimes, but treat it with caution. Superannuation, assets in a discretionary trust, and property held as joint tenants can pass outside your estate, and family provision claims are usually made against the estate. However, New South Wales has 'notional estate' rules that let the court claw certain assets — including superannuation and some transfers made before death — back into the estate to satisfy a claim. In one NSW case (Benz v Armstrong [2022] NSWSC 534), the court redirected several million dollars of super away from a valid binding nomination and back to the deceased's children. So 'just put it in super or a trust' is not reliable protection, especially in NSW. Get advice before restructuring.
A statement of reasons (sometimes a letter of wishes, or, more strongly, a sworn statutory declaration) is a document explaining why you have left a child out or given them less. It does not block a claim — the court is not bound by it — but it is powerful evidence of your intentions. Useful content includes the history of the relationship and any estrangement (who caused it), attempts to reconcile, financial support already provided (with figures), and your understanding of the child's financial position.
Time limits vary by state and — importantly — differ in what starts the clock. New South Wales (12 months) and Queensland (9 months) run from the date of death; Victoria, Western Australia, South Australia, the ACT (all 6 months) and the Northern Territory (12 months) run from the grant of probate or administration; Tasmania's 3 months from the grant is the shortest in the country. Courts can allow late claims in limited circumstances, usually only before the estate is fully distributed.
Not to make the Will itself — you can add a clear, deliberate exclusion using an online platform like Will Hero. But disinheriting a child is one of the higher-risk estate decisions, so if your estate is large, a dependent or disabled child is involved, or a challenge looks likely, professional legal advice is worthwhile to document your reasons and structure the estate properly.
About Will Hero
Will Hero is an Australian online Will platform that provides state-specific Will templates designed around Australian succession law. Documents are created using guided software and reviewed against jurisdiction requirements used across the platform. Thousands of Australians have used Will Hero to prepare their Will online.
Will Hero provides general legal information and document preparation tools and is not a law firm or a provider of personalised legal advice. The platform is intended for use by Australian residents making a Will under Australian state law.